Current Issue

  • Opening the Door

    Weaving hospitality into the fabric of your company cultureRead More

  • At The End of Their Lease

    Members at Shaughnessy Golf and Country Club are proud to call the Vancouver course home. But with its lease expiring and unlikely to be extended, how long will they be able to call it that?Read More

  • Building An Empire

    Rod Metzler and Empire Golf are overcoming a saturated marketplace in Northern California by offering an array of initiatives for the entire family at each of their four facilitiesRead More


Online Exclusives

  • Tackling Tee Times
  • Tackling Tee Times

    It’s been just over a year since the launch of the Golf USA Tee Time Coalition, a joint initiative of the NGCOA and PGA of America that’s working to ensure a balanced marketplace in public golf. The action has been nonstop ever since for its managing director, Jared Williams, who sat down this month with the Golf Business podcast ì3 Key Thoughts’ to discuss what the coalition has accomplished thus far and what lies ahead.Read More

May 2017

Big Brother Watching

bigbrotherwatching.jpg‭As awful as litigation can be for course owners, legal actions have become part of life in the golf industry. Unfortunately, every month or two, a new lawsuit pops up with the potential to set a painful precedent for all operators.

Such is the case in Pennsylvania, where District Court Judge Michael Koury, Jr., found the owners of Morgan Hill Golf Course in contempt of court for not videoing every golf shot struck on one of their holes.

The order to record “all golf swings” stemmed from a case filed by Jerzy and Halina Wisniewski, who sued the course because of golf balls “whizzing” into their yard, which is right of the 13th hole. The course owners say that, because of a thick cluster of trees and the physics of a golf shot, the couple’s claims are impossible. According to Erv McLain, an attorney representing Morgan Hill: “I believe that when the entire case plays out before a jury, there’s no way they are going to find us liable to them for anything.”

Because of the suit, Judge Koury issued the unique order for the course to install video equipment and capture the path and trajectory of every shot on the hole.

But while operators were budgeting, buying and attempting to install the cameras, Pennsylvania had an unseasonably warm snap in late February. The course reopened before the cameras could be installed. The Wisniewskis went back to court on March 2, and Judge Koury fined Morgan Hill $1,000 for contempt to cover the couple’s attorney fees.

“It shouldn’t have occurred, so we’re going to pay the fine and get on with it,” McLain says.

Errant golf balls in neighboring yards have been the subjects of lawsuits for years. For decades, course owners were held harmless. People who bought or built homes on golf courses assumed the risk. It was like buying a house on a hillside in California: You might never have an earthquake, mudslide or fire, but you knew going in that the possibility existed. However, recent rulings against golf courses have changed the legal landscape, with homeowners forcing clubs to reroute or even close holes to keep errant shots from ever landing on private, residential land.

The outcome of this case remains uncertain, but one thing is for sure: court-ordered cameras on golf courses are now a precedent, one owners will need to consider for the foreseeable future.



Leave a Comment



Featured Resource

Bright Ideas Archive

Brought to you by ValleyCrest Golf MaintenanceBright Ideas Icon 
Access some of the most creative ideas golf course owners and operators have to offer within the Bright Ideas area of the GB Archive.Read More

May 2017 Issue

Connect With Us

facebooktwitterNGCOABuyers GuideYouTube